Since late 2016 we have entered the age of disclosures! Fasten your mental safety belt and enjoy the ride! Heretic

Sunday, April 26, 2015

Investigative panel to examine scientific data falsification by global warming scientists!


Top scientists start to examine fiddled global warming figures

From Christopher Booker's article

See also:

Global Warming Policy Foundation has invited a panel of experts to investigate and report on these controversies.

Update 28-Oct-2015:

It appears that the government's climate scientists want to hide some data. I wonder why?

The federal government’s chief climate research agency is refusing to give House Republicans the detailed information they want on a controversial study on climate change.

At the center of the controversy is a study that concluded there has not been a 15-year “pause” in global warming. Some NOAA scientists contributed to the report.

Update 11-Nov-2015:

Cold Sun Rising article


New studies flip climate-change notions upside down

The sun will go into "hibernation" mode around 2030, and it has already started to get sleepy. At the Royal Astronomical Society's annual meeting in July, Professor Valentina Zharkova of Northumbria University in the UK confirmed it - the sun will begin its Maunder Minimum (Grand Solar Minimum) in 15 years. Other scientists had suggested years ago that this change was imminent, but Zharkova's model is said to have near-perfect accuracy.
In the 2009 "climategate scandal", e-mails and documents from IPCC-affiliated scientists were leaked that indicated they had manipulated data and reports to jibe with the AGW[Anthropogenic Global Warming] theory. References were made to "hiding the decline" through the use of "tricks". Then in 2012 Anthony Watts, a meteorologist and self-described whistle-blower, caught the NOAA changing temperature data from the 1930s to make the decade appear colder than it had been. Another whistle-blower, blogger Tony Heller, although clearly aligned with conservative groups like the Heartland Institute, has amassed impressive data. He claims that, since 1997, the world has actually been getting colder and Goddard and the NOAA are committing "climate fraud". The NOAA has declined to respond.
Solar cycle 24 - two cycles prior the cycle that's expected to bottom out into a Maunder Minimum - was weak. In 2013-14 it reached its maximum far below average. Meanwhile extreme cold-weather anomalies have occurred around the world. Last year "polar vortices" slammed into the central US and Siberia as a third hovered over the Atlantic. All 50 US states, including Hawaii, had temperatures below freezing for the first time in recorded history. Snowfall records were broken in cities in the US, Canada, Italy, New Zealand, Australia, Japan and elsewhere. Southern American states and central Mexico, where snow is rare, got heavy snow, as did the Middle East.

This past summer the cold didn't let up, with more temperature records across the US and rare summer snows seen in Canada, the US and China. Birds have migrated early in the last two years. Antarctic sea ice set a new record in 2013 and it was broken again in 2014.

Not even Thailand was immune. In 2014 Bangkok hit its coldest low in 30 years, while 63 lives were lost in the North.
Other researchers and organisations are also predicting global cooling - the Russian Academy of Science, the Astronomical Institute of the Slovak Academy of Scientists, the Institute of Terrestrial Magnetism Russia, Victor Manuel Velesco Herrera at the National University of Mexico, the Bulgarian Institute of Astronomy, Dr Tim Patterson at Carleton University in Canada, Drs Lin Zhen at Nanjing University in China, just to name a few. ...

Another interesting link:

Antarctic Ice is Growing, Even Hit a 'Record,' But Evening News Shows Hype Melting Arctic Instead

Update 28/11/2015:

More previous winter snow patches left in Scottish mountains than in the previous 21 years.

Six times more since 2014 than the average.

Update 12/12/2015:

How I was vaporised by the BBC's Green Gestapo after daring to mock the Met Office and global warming

I was accused of having shown disrespect to climate change. Mr Lilley had cracked a joke: ‘They [the Met Office] come before the Select Committee on Energy and Climate Change . . . and tell us they need even more money for even bigger computers so they can be even more precisely wrong in future.’


JC said...

I'm not buying this at all.Its likely the work of the hydrocarbon industry.Follow the money.Given all the reputable scientists who support global warming (without monetary connections)its hard to believe the data is suspect.I'm shocked at the number of people falling for the hydrocarbon industries counter offensive.Its good to question the official view of anything but I doubt if this questioning has a valid basis.Even my favorite philosopher warns of man made global warming.

Anonymous said...

"Given all the reputable scientists who support global warming (without monetary connections)"

Really? Who are all these scientists that work for free?

Stan (Heretic) said...

Hi JC,

Which of the date do you not trust the top or the bottom, or both? Are you suggesting that the top graph was proven and the bottom (raw) was fudged?

I agree about the large oil connection, but not in a way that you are suggesting. The old rule "follow the money" but also "find the motive" and "who is really fighting whom" does still apply.

The biggest enemy of an oil company is another oil company!

There is evidence indicating that some large oil companies have been channeling money for enviro-activism to undermine their competitors. They are quite successful - managed to kill nuclear industry first, then coal, now they are getting rid of Alberta tar sands. What a feat!

See for example this or

Very likely, in my heretical opinion, the same has been happening in case of global warming funding.


Sam said...

I've had a sneaking suspicion that the global warming scare was funded by the financial industry. Notice global warming and carbon tax/credits came around at the same time. That and the general financial trend to charge us little monopolist fees for every action in life. They want us to pay them just to be alive. If they could they'd shut our air off and charge us for it.

Stan (Heretic) said...

That sounds plausible too. Time will tell,, it could well be both sectors financing the falsehood. There is a general pattern of spreading the falsehood for the purpose of manipulating the public. To gain an advantage. You my be right, financials may have an ever better reason to make energy scares in order to force people into more debt. I predict that it will backfire badly against the big businesses and big governments who perpetrated this scheme. For example, history tells us that water scarcity monopolies of Central Asia did not last very long and their collapse was usually violent and quick because nobody wanted to fight to defend them.