2008 - Age of Awakening / 2016 - Age of disclosures / 2021 - Age of Making Choices & Separation / Next Stage - Age of Reconnection! Heretic

Sunday, April 7, 2019

Schizophrenia put into remission on keto diet

.

Chronic Schizophrenia Put Into Remission Without Medication/New research suggests ketogenic diet may play a role in treating schizophrenia.
by Chris Palmer, M.D., Apr 06, 2019

Quotes

An 82 year old woman with chronic paranoid schizophrenia since age 17

The first patient documented in the Schizophrenia Research article is a woman who spent nearly her whole life suffering chronic, treatment-resistant schizophrenia. For more than 50 years, she endured paranoia, disorganized speech, visual and auditory hallucinations. By the time she was 70, she was suicidal and had been hospitalized repeatedly for psychosis or suicide attempts. She had been treated with over ten different antipsychotic and mood stabilizing medications, including regular antipsychotic injections. None of them helped her symptoms. She was unable to care for herself and had a court-appointed guardian and home health services.

At the age of 70, weighing 330 pounds, she went to a medical weight loss clinic and was started on a ketogenic diet. Within two weeks of starting the diet, she reported a noticeable reduction not only in her weight but also her psychotic symptoms. Within several months, she started to feel so much better that she was able to stop taking her psychiatric medications while remaining on the diet. Over time, her mood stabilized, and her hallucinations and paranoia remitted completely. She was no longer suicidal. Her case was first reported in 2009.

Today, 12 years later, she has lost a total of 150 pounds and remains on the ketogenic diet. She takes no medications and remains symptom-free. She was able to regain her independence, no longer requiring the guardian and the home health care team. When I recently spoke with her, she recalled her decades of suffering and hopelessness, and said that since starting the diet, she has had a "new life," and is happy to be alive.

A 39 year old woman with schizophrenia for 20 years

The second patient described in the article is a thirty-nine year old woman who suffered from depression, anxiety, anorexia nervosa, hallucinations and paranoia since her teens. As patients sometimes do, she concealed her psychotic symptoms when she was initially treated for depression and anorexia. When she finally reported her psychotic symptoms later in her twenties, she was diagnosed with schizophrenia. For the next ten years, she was treated with 7 different antipsychotic medications—including clozapine (called the “gold standard antipsychotic medication”) - along with antidepressants and anti-anxiety medications. Nevertheless, she continued to have symptoms.

She was having chronic gastrointestinal problems, so she saw a doctor who recommended the ketogenic diet. Noticing some improvement of her symptoms and being frustrated with all of her psychiatric medications, she unwisely stopped taking all 14 of her medications “cold turkey.” This sent her into severe psychosis requiring an extended hospitalization. In the hospital, she was re-medicated with Haldol-decanoate (an injectable medication which had not worked for her previously) and she continued the ketogenic diet. Within a month on both Haldol and the ketogenic diet, she reported complete remission of her psychotic symptoms for the first time since she was 14. Over the following year, she slowly tapered off Haldol, and remained free of psychotic symptoms. Of note, she lost 70 pounds from the diet, which exacerbated her anorexia. She has since regained 30 of those pounds and maintains a healthy weight today. 5 years after starting the ketogenic diet, she is off all antipsychotic medications, remains on the diet, and is free of all psychotic symptoms. She has since finished graduate school and now works full time.

Interestingly, these aren’t the first reports of the ketogenic diet for schizophrenia
While inspiring, these two case reports join a growing body of evidence supporting the use of the ketogenic diet in the treatment of schizophrenia.

Schizophrenia in 1965

In 1965, ten women hospitalized with schizophrenia who were already receiving medications and electroconvulsive therapy (ECT or “shock therapy”) were also placed on the ketogenic diet for a month. The researchers reported that their symptoms improved after two weeks on the diet, but then returned back to their baseline level of symptoms after the diet was stopped.

Schizoaffective disorder in 2017

In 2017, I reported two other cases of schizoaffective disorder improving significantly on the ketogenic diet. Schizoaffective disorder is a diagnosis that includes both a mix of schizophrenia and a mood disorder, often bipolar disorder. One man and one woman, both in their 30’s, had suffered treatment-resistant schizoaffective disorder for years. On the diet, their symptoms were greatly improved, and they both lost significant amounts of weight. Off the diet, their symptoms returned.

Schizophrenia in Ecuador

In 2018, two Ecuadorian twins, one male and one female, diagnosed with schizophrenia since the ages of 14 and 18 were started on a 6-week trial of the ketogenic diet. This study had a psychiatrist rate each twin’s symptoms while being unaware of their diet status. Interestingly, only when the patients were compliant with the diet did their symptoms improve. They also both lost weight. When they stopped the diet at the end of the study, their symptoms returned to their baseline level.

Stan's comments: - who were the medical criminals who stopped their patients' treatment as the article described, in spite of the clear improvement and despite of no viable alternatives? Why there was no information published and made available over the years, to other patients suffering from this debilitating disease, and their families? It is very symptomatic of a very serious disease rotting the medical system from within, in all countries. What have the government departments in charge of public health policies done to make that treatment available? Why did the judicial system refrain from punishing the people involved in maintaining this information hidden or even actively discouraging it by denigrating all ketogenic diets, all high fat low carbohydrate diets publicly and in the media? Who were the people, and who financed those who campaigned in the media smearing Drs. Yudkin, Atkins, Bernstein and others and why did public prosecutors and politicians allowed that to continue?

More connections between metabolic disorder and psychiatric/neurological conditions:

"Impaired insulin signaling in unaffected siblings and patients with first episode psychosis", by Virginie-Anne Chouinard et al., Mol Psychiatry. 2018 Mar 9


Quote

Patients with psychotic disorders are at high risk for type 2 diabetes mellitus, and there is increasing evidence that patients display glucose metabolism abnormalities before significant antipsychotic medication exposure. In the present study, we examined insulin action by quantifying insulin sensitivity in first episode psychosis (FEP) patients and unaffected siblings, compared to healthy individuals, using a physiological-based model and comprehensive assessment battery. Twenty-two unaffected siblings, 18 FEP patients and 15 healthy unrelated controls were evaluated using a 2-hour oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT), with 7 samples of plasma glucose and serum insulin concentration measurements. Insulin sensitivity was quantified using the oral minimal model method. Lipid, leptin, free fatty acids and inflammatory marker levels were also measured. Anthropometric, nutrient and activity assessments were conducted; total body composition and fat distribution were determined using whole-body dual energy x-ray absorptiometry. Insulin sensitivity significantly differed among groups (F=6.01, P=0.004), with patients and siblings showing lower insulin sensitivity, compared to controls (P=0.006, and P=0.002, respectively).

Comment: Comparison between people diagnosed with psychiatric disorder and their sibling who were not diagnosed and therefore not affected by psychiatric drugs, showed the common underlying metabolic disorder involving insulin insensitivity and high risk of developing diabetes type 2.

--------------------
Update 11/04/2019 Another interesting paper on this subject. A different angle:

"Psychosis and Symbiosis: Microbiome and Schizophrenia. Fascinating new research links the gut and brain in sickness and health.", by Emily Deans M.D., Posted Mar 31, 2019

Quote:

Those mice that received the transplants from schizophrenic patients had higher levels of glutamine in the serum and hippocampus, decreased glutamate in the hippocampus, and increased GABA in the hippocampus. These difference were localized to areas of the brain particularly rich in glutamate and its metabolites (i.e., the outer shell of the brain and the hippocampus). This means that a transplant of a different microbiome led to different GABA-glutamate-glutamine neurotransmission in mouse brains. Corresponding human brain areas are related to memory, neuron repair, and executive functioning, all significantly impacted in schizophrenia.

In addition, the schizophrenia microbiome recipient mice had different behaviors than the healthy control mice, with exaggerated startle response and increased activity.

7 comments :

Michael44 said...

There is a big vegan movement happening in Australia at the moment Stan. I counted 9 different magazines in my newsagent the other day that are devoted to veganism,and,so many of my newspaper "health" lift-outs are devoted to vegan lifestyle/recipes. And lots of vegan activism going on at the moment too i.e tens (over 100) of people trespassing onto family farms and scaring the farmers and families.

Thanx for all the wonderful reading material on your site Stan. You were one of the first internet writers that I found when I started looking into the question "What is my natural diet?" and helped me to see that I should not be afraid of animal fat.

Michael44 said...

And,one of the very few vegan activists that actually got arrested for tresspassing went to court and was fined $1.00! Not $100, but $1.00. Absolutely ridiculous.

Stan Bleszynski said...

Hi Michael,

I am glad to have helped contribute to your nutritional "corruption"! :)

This is strange indeed. Somebody must be financing these people, on-line and their street actions.It seems to come in waves. The first push was in the 1990-ties, to counter Dr. Atkins who has been very successful in trashing the medical establishment.I noticed back then that the most prominent at that time, vegan promoter - Dr. Dean Ornish was financed by a billionaire junk bond investor M.Milken, and then got very close to Bill Clinton (and lived). The current vegan push is probably countermeasure against the explosive popularity of the keto and paleo diets which must be making a lot of elite people worried. However it seems to be already backfiring since some of the good looking "Sheila" involved in the vegan marketing have been either outed for eating non-vegan food or quit themselves after realizing the negative impact it is having on their own health. I am sure you must else remember a few years ago the "50 bananas a day" crowd. Quite extraordinary on-line circus and apparently well financed too. It seems to have fallen apart duo to health problems and in-fighting.

When you mentioned 1$ fine, it appears to follow the same pattern of corrupt judiciary letting a certain kind of socially disruptive activism go unpunished while some other (i.e. political conservatists) may even get jailed. Especially in the UK and the Commonwealth countries.

The really good question, I think is how did they, whoever organized these actions, managed to corrupt or influence the judges? If it weren't for that, I would have thought it is the pharmaceutical and medical biz. With the judges on their side - I am no longer sure about that. I imagine it must be some even more powerful group or a cult that spans all countries and is entrenched among the power elites, high level government management & employees, politicians (of all parties!), judges, lawyers and police officers. Hmm, what could that be?

Stan



Michael44 said...

Stan,

We have an organisation called Get-Up in Australia (I don’t know if they have associate organisations in Canada or the USA). I can't bring myself to look at their website at the moment and so I am only going from what I have heard, but, apparently they are meant to be an politically impartial organisation that accepts/collects donations that are then used to 1- Raise public awareness of issues that they consider to be in major need of change (such as “Climate Change”), 2-To fund the lobbying of Government and other organisations in order to further their agendas, and, 3-To organise “direct-action” when they consider that it is required (I am guessing). One very irksome point is that they have been designated as a charity and therefore have been given tax-free status! So, I wouldn’t be surprised if they are at least partially involved in these vegan protests happening at present. And, heaven knows who or what people and organisations are providing some of their donations received.

Stan, there is more I want to say in reply to your comment, but, I think I’ll just stick for the moment to the most important point you raised, and that is your last sentence:-…….

Yes indeed, what could that be??? 

I’m guessing that at least a part of my family may have talked to other family members about my “way-out” beliefs, but I don’t know for sure as I’ve only just brought this subject up with the ones I felt were going to be at least partially sympathetic to my views (such as my friend and flatmate). For the others, I can guess what some of their responses would be. I love my family (i.e I am talking about my Mum, brothers and sisters, and in-laws), and, maybe I am not giving them enough credit when it comes to how I believe how some of them would respond if I brought up this topic, but, it is not easy to ever bring this subject up with some loved-ones and friends (as I’m sure you know  ). It’s especially hard when we can’t actually prove our views. So many people just refuse to even comprehend that it could even be a small possibility. I don’t expect people to believe that it is definitely a reality on our planet at the present time (especially because I can’t even say for sure myself),but, why couldn’t they at least be open to the possibility of such a thing being true? Surely that can’t hurt. Alas, so many refuse to even entertain the notion that a hidden, manipulative, and malevolent global elite may actually exist.

Oh, I just saw the headline of your latest post an hour ago (I haven’t read it yet). Most of the time when I see something like what you posted, I have a thought such as “Good, this is more evidence that I am on the right track” and/or “Good, more evidence to have if I ever have a debate about diet and health etc”. But, this time Stan, when I saw the headline that people with low cholesterol are dropping like flies, I just immediately felt sad.

Ok, enough of this for the moment. I’ll go and read your post. 

Thanx Stan.

Michael44 said...

Oh, one thing to clarify -

I had heard that Get-Up were meant to be politically impartial. But,of course,they are anything but.

Stan Bleszynski said...

Hi Michael44,

I found that public non-for profit organizations tend to be the least impartial of all institutions. They follow the agenda of their donors and is usually much worse than just a simple corporate commercial interest (for profit). Corporate marketing agenda is less harmful, imho, than some hidden agendas of foundations, NGOs or churches.

I think, We can neutralize these parasites using more of the openness and telling the truth.

People are often too timid on the on-line forums, afraid of disclosing their personal data or just talk openly for the fear of offending someone, losing a job for political views, or just misguided into thinking that it may be inappropriate. It is foolish, since most of the personal data and opinions, are already well known to the authorities and to the corporate elites (and such personal data is freely traded on the black market!). The secrecy seems to work now more against us than helps us, while the openness works against the social manipulators and the authorities. Regards,
Stan

Michael44 said...

Hi Stan.

I'm sorry for the late reply. I have been meaning to get back to you.

Yes, I know Stan. I understand what you are saying and you maybe/probably are right :) .

Shortly though,I'll be starting to look for employment again and I am anxious etc etc etc. Oh Stan, why can't life be easier. it should be easier shouldn't it?? and I know I've got it good compared to so may other people on the planet.

I will keep what you have said to me in mind. God,I don't mean to sound trite but I suppose it is a trite answer.

And now, just from the personal perspective -

I had a great time with my family and stayed with my Mum on Sat nite while the others came up on Sun for Mothers Day. She is a beautiful lady and we get on so well these days.

So,I had brought up the latest edition of New Dawn magazine and was quietly reading it when she asked what I was reading. I told her that it was a mag about lots of different things (I didn't mention that it contained lots of different articles relating to alternative topics :) ). She sort of knows that I'm into "alternative points-of-view"
:) Anyway, I told her that I happened to be reading an article about the disappearance of Frederick Valentich over Bass Strait Southern Australia just over 40 years ago whilst flying his Cessna, and whereby he had reported to air-traffic-control that he had encountered a flying craft just a few minutes before transmission ceased and he was never heard of again,and not trace of his plane has ever been found. This happened in our neck-of-the-woods so Mum had heard of this case before (I'm fairly sure). Anyway, Mum then mentioned that she thought all this UFO stuff was/is a load of nonsense (or words to that effect). I explained that lots of stuff we here about is probably a load of nonsense (such as people mistaking Venus for something else)but that some reports such as this are not easily explained away (or words to this effect). We left it at that and I had a really nice time with my family.

So, that exchange worked out well but it can be a potential minefield to navigate when talking about such things as these with loved ones, friends, and aquaintances who aren't quite on the same page as you are (as you are already well and truly aware of I'm sure Stan :) ).

Such is life in these strange times.

I will keep reading more of your site content Stan. I still have lots more to get through.

Thanx again Stan