2008 - Age of Awakening / 2016 - Age of disclosures / 2021 - Age of Making Choices & Separation / Next Stage - Age of Reconnection! Heretic

Wednesday, January 8, 2020

statins, low cholesterol make some people crazy

.

"The medications that change who we are" by By Zaria Gorvett, BBC Future,
8th January 2020


The article discusses effects of drugs such as statins, paracetamol, L-dopa or antihistamines on personality disorder and character changes. Particulary interesting are statins side effects since these type of drugs are routinely prescribed with the intention of continous usage.

Quote:
“Patient Five” was in his late 50s when a trip to the doctors changed his life.

He had diabetes, and he had signed up for a study to see if taking a “statin” – a kind of cholesterol-lowering drug – might help. So far, so normal.

But soon after he began the treatment, his wife began to notice a sinister transformation. A previously reasonable man, he became explosively angry and – out of nowhere – developed a tendency for road rage. During one memorable episode, he warned his family to keep away, lest he put them in hospital.

Out of fear of what might happen, Patient Five stopped driving. Even as a passenger, his outbursts often forced his wife to abandon their journeys and turn back. Afterwards, she’d leave him alone to watch TV and calm down. She became increasingly fearful for her own safety.

Then one day, Patient Five had an epiphany. “He was like, ‘Wow, it really seems that these problems started when I enrolled in this study’,” says Beatrice Golomb, who leads a research group at the University of California, San Diego.


... Over the years, Golomb has collected reports from patients across the United States – tales of broken marriages, destroyed careers, and a surprising number of men who have come unnervingly close to murdering their wives. In almost every case, the symptoms began when they started taking statins, then promptly returned to normal when they stopped; one man repeated this cycle five times before he realised what was going on.


Golomb first suspected a connection between statins and personality changes nearly two decades ago, after a series of mysterious discoveries, such as that people with lower cholesterol levels are more likely to die violent deaths. Then one day, she was chatting to a cholesterol expert about the potential link in the hallway at her work, when he brushed it off as obviously nonsense. “And I said ‘how do we know that?’,” she says.

Filled with fresh determination, Golomb scoured the scientific and medical literature for clues. “There was shockingly more evidence than I had imagined,” she says. For one thing, she uncovered findings that if you put primates on a low-cholesterol diet, they become more aggressive.

Golomb remains convinced that lower cholesterol can cause behavioural changes in both men and women
There was even a potential mechanism: lowering the animals’ cholesterol seemed to affect their levels of serotonin, an important brain chemical thought to be involved in regulating mood and social behaviour in animals. Even fruit flies start fighting if you mess up their serotonin levels, but it also has some unpleasant effects in people – studies have linked it to violence, impulsivity, suicide and murder.

If statins were affecting people’s brains, this was likely to be a direct consequence of their ability to lower cholesterol.

Since then, more direct evidence has emerged. Several studies have supported a potential link between irritability and statins, including a randomised controlled trial – the gold-standard of scientific research – that Golomb led, involving more than 1,000 people. It found that the drug increased aggression in post-menopausal women though, oddly, not in men.

In 2018, a study uncovered the same effect in fish. Giving statins to Nile tilapia made them more confrontational and – crucially – altered the levels of serotonin in their brains. This suggests that the mechanism that links cholesterol and violence may have been around for millions of years.

Golomb remains convinced that lower cholesterol, and, by extension, statins, can cause behavioural changes in both men and women, though the strength of the effect varies drastically from person to person. “There are lines of evidence converging,” she says, citing a study she conducted in Sweden, which involved comparing a database of the cholesterol levels of 250,000 people with local crime records. “Even adjusting for confounding factors, it was still the case that people with lower cholesterol at baseline were significantly more likely to be arrested for violent crimes.”.



Reference:

"Cholesterol and violence: is there a connection?", by
Golomb BA., Ann Intern Med. 1998 Mar 15;128(6):478-87.



10 comments :

JC said...

What about the older rural Chinese who eat a diet of 90% white rice and 10% vegetables? They have very low cholesterol around 130 on average. They dont seem to have any ill effects from very low cholesterol.

Stan Bleszynski said...

No "ill effects"? How do you know this?

Stan Bleszynski said...

JC, Since you were/are science teacher (correct me if I am wrong) you may be interested in my Clifford Algebra course I am currently running on twitter. To find it, go to Twitter and search @stanbles #cliffordalgebra .

JC said...

I play tournament table tennis and have since my college days. I have a large number of Chinese friends since table tennis in China is like football in the US.I play with a number of older Chinese players almost every day and quite a few are in their early to mid 90s.They are able to play for several hours jumping around and slamming the ball and bending to pick up the ball 500 or more times. They are active disease fee and healthy. I have noticed this pattern for many years and when I ask them what they eat its rice and more rice. The younger Chinese eat a very different diet, more like the SAD but still fairly heavy on rice. None of them are overweight and generally tend to be downright skinny.So I tend to believe much that we all hear about the Chinese being healthy and trim since I have seen it first hand for decades.

Since I have been retired from teaching for a good while now I dont do much in the way of academics. I remain interested in nutritional science, economics, and theoretical physics but not much in math anymore. My diet is now the SAD. I know its not healthy but it sure is enjoyable. I had burgers yesterday!

Stan Bleszynski said...

Hi JC,

Observing the 90 or 100-years old may be skewed with the selection bias. If you have 1% of the people whose bodies are capable of withstanding a bad plant-based diet or high carbohydrate diet due to some peculiar genetics, while the rest 99% of the other people would die much earlier, then you will end up playing table tennis with those 1-percenters drawing biased conclusions without realizing it.

Regards,
Stan

JC said...

Could be I just encounter the ones who are able to play at a competitive tournament level which acts as filter.

But, As you know the data speaks well for the Asian diet in terms of cardio disease and life span. I do wonder however if the real success comes from their low weight and the fact that they eat far less calories than most others.

Dr Essee, former heart surgeon at the Cleveland Clinic, treated his patients with a low fat whole food vegan diet with success.I doubt the Cleveland Clinic would allow that if he did not convincingly demonstrate its success.

Dr Kempner treated his patients, with great success, with the famous rice diet at Duke University.

None of the data I have seen is consistent with your use of "withstanding a plant based diet..." It may not be the ideal diet but there is nothing to show that its downright unhealthy when done as prescribed by Fuhrman/McDougall etc.

Again,It may not be the low fat component. It may just be that it is a low calorie diet that leads to weight loss.

None of this concerns me personally anymore since I am enjoying the SAD but I still have an academic interest nutritional science.

I am discusted with the "religious" group think fanatics on the McDougall message board. They will not allow any type of questioning or anything other than strict obedience to the "rules" and they dont seem to realize they have become fanatics....all in the name of keeping the discussions within strict narrow limits. But that does not necessarily mean the diet they promote is unhealthy.

Stan Bleszynski said...

Hi JC,

I am enjoying my meals too, mostly natural unprocessed meat, fish, dairy and some veggies but not much. It's definitely not SAD. If a rice based diet works for a person than it's OK. The key word is "works" determined objectively rather than on faith. I totally agree with your take on McDougall's vegan forum. They don't realize that by stifling a true debate (and omega-3 deficiency) they are destroying their own brains. Our minds require a constant stimulation and it expands only as the result of interacting with each other and other consciousness. Human mind is the best most open communicator - but it is also the reason it can be relatively easily possessed by various parasitic, often destructive thoughtforms like veganism, progressivism, climatism, genderism, political correctness, marxism, religiosity etc. It's very harmful if a person resonates with those parasitic thoughtforms and petrifies into dogmas.

I think it is the school system. The school system contributed to that by teachers playing along with the program aimed at teaching kids by rote but not how to think, teaching obedient and compliant workers (with no jobs!). McDougall forum is the symptom of this disease. I think, after the viral dust settles, the system will not come back! In my humble opinions, the school system that has fallen the most, will be the first lasting casualty of the virus.

JC said...

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NelIXCuuSZ0

Stan Bleszynski said...

Hi JC,

Looks like Penn Jillette may have recently gained all if not most of that weight back, on his "whole plant based diet".

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3beYLyOsy04

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FmtIxWKh8EU

JC said...

After saving his life he changed his diet and now eats everything (whatever he wants).However while he has gained some weight back he is still far lighter than his initial weight of over 300 lbs. I believe he weighs in around 220 now, so he is still down 100 lbs.He is not now on a whole plant diet and has not been for a while. That enabled him to gain some weight back as he had become too thin. Being too thin was a problem I had while on a PBWF diet.