The further a society drifts from the truth, the more it will hate those who speak it. ... In a time of deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act. George Orwell

Sunday, July 16, 2017

New report casts doubts on validity of NOAA, NASA global temperature data

Indicating a possibility that the publications and data used to justify the recent Climate Change initiatives such as Paris Accord may have been falsified!

"On the Validity of NOAA, NASA and Hadley CRU Global Average Surface Temperature Data & The Validity of EPA’s CO2 Endangerment Finding"
Abridged Research Report,
Dr. James P. Wallace III, Dr. Joseph S. D’Aleo, Dr. Craig D. Idso, June 2017

The objective of this research was to test the hypothesis that Global Average Surface Temperature (GAST) data, produced by NOAA, NASA, and HADLEY, are sufficiently credible estimates of global average temperatures such that they can be relied upon for climate modeling and policy analysis purposes.
The conclusive findings of this research are that the three GAST data sets are not a valid representation of reality. In fact, the magnitude of
their historical data adjustments, that removed their cyclical temperature patterns, are totally inconsistent with published and credible U.S. and other temperature data. Thus, it is impossible to conclude from the three published GAST data sets that recent years have been the warmest ever –despite current claims of record setting warming. Finally, since GAST data set validity is a necessary condition for EPA’s GHG/CO2 Endangerment Finding, it too is invalidated by these research findings.

An article published yesterday in summarizes the results as follows, quote:

As world leaders, namely in the European Union, attack President Trump for pulling out of the Paris Climate Agreement which would have saddled Americans with billions upon billions of dollars in debt and economic losses, a new bombshell report that analyzed Global Average Surface Temperature (GAST) data produced by NASA, the NOAA and HADLEY proves the President was right on target with his refusal to be a part of the new initiative.

According to the report, which has been peer reviewed by administrators, scientists and researchers from the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), The Massachusetts Institute of Technology (M.I.T.), and several of America’s leading universities, the data is completely bunk: ...


Update 6-Aug-2017



Graham Lloyd, The Australian
Recorded temperatures at the Bureau­ of Meteorology’s Thredbo Top automatic weather station have dropped below -10C in the past week, after action was taken to make the facility “fit for ­purpose”.
A record of the Thredbo Top station for 3am on Wednesday shows a temperature reading of -10.6C. This compares with the BoM’s monthly highlights for June and July, both showing a low of -9.6C.
The BoM said it had taken immed­iate action to replace the Thredbo station after concerns were raised that very low temperatures were not making it onto the official record. Controversy has dogged the bureau’s automatic weather station network since Goulburn man Lance Pigeon saw a -10.4C reading on the BoM’s website on July 2 automatically adjust to -10C, then disappear.
Later independent monitoring of the Thredbo Top station by scientist Jennifer Marohasy showed a recording of -10.6C ­vanish from the record.


guest said...

Off topic, but something in your ballpark:

"Alarmingly, an assessment of industry-sponsored RCTs showed the median increase in life expectancy for selected participants in secondary prevention trials who adhered to taking statins every day for several years was a mere four days."

From "The cholesterol and calorie hypotheses are both dead — it is time to focus on the real culprit: insulin resistance"

Found via:

4 days! It's beyond satire.

guest said...

And something on topic:

Orwell's Nightmare: Temperature Adjustments and Climate Change

What Is The Average Global Temperature?

Anonymous said...

I read the other day that some scientist said the satellite data needed to be "adjusted" because of some calibration error, "that wasn't done correctly in the past". I'm thinking,"here we go again". They can't get the satellite data to match so they're going to change it too.

There is some massive corruption in our government. I think vast numbers of civil servants are being blackmailed. There's a LOT of circumstantial evidence for this of you look around a little.

My guess is someone, somewhere looked at the market for energy, biggest on the planet. Trillions and said to themselves,"If I could just get a little piece of that" so they set up a system of carbon credits where they get a little piece of the action every time someone burns some carbon and wallah we have the Green house effect.

Sam said...

I go through and look at the post on the side bar every now and then, I say this,"... I have to add this to explain why: ever since my out of body/near-death experience in 1979 I do not react to various threats [in the same way] as other people, nor do I consider intellectual beliefs and theories very seriously..." here.

If it's not too personal I'd like to hear the story behind this. I also notice you have a link to a
Rupert Sheldrake's talk. I find this stuff interesting.

Stan Bleszynski said...

Hi Sam,
Part of that story, is described on the left hand side margin of this blog under "OBE" title. I described the part which begun making a sense from the physical (the "extended" physics, I mean) only recently. Back then I was on the last year of my physics study and I could not wrap my logical brain around that, the speed of light limit and all that. Did you have an out of body or near-death experience yourself?

Stan Bleszynski said...


Not only do the authorities (for example US NOAA) adjust the data but they keep readjusting them as the time goes by, multiple times and always in one direction - so as to maximize the conclusion. It is a more blatant form of falsification than what did the pharmaceutical and food companies do in the past in promoting the high sugar low animal fat nutrition - at least the latter were doing it more intelligently and took us longer to debunk.

The official climate "science" is very easy to debunk because everybody can see that something is very fishy because the process is very crudely sewn. However the authorities are now using the brute force against dissenters - they just fire every scientist who questions them until there is nobody left.

Regarding the financial motives by Al Gore and similar high profile criminals. I suspect that there may be more than just a financial scam. There is too much consistency in the way it is pushed, in every country on every level, even within the grass root movements, especially on the left, and in almost all the media! I suspect that is being coordinated from within some pan-national secret societies movement. It appears to be a hastily engineered but very energetically promoted diversionary deception.

Your guess as to the purpose, is probably as good as mine.